Research

Research

I develop interpretable, reliable, and robust machine learning by combining deep learning, causal inference, and domain knowledge. Polar science is my main testbed, because there the distribution shift comes from the physical system itself rather than from a simulation.

THEME 1

Causal representation learning with partial knowledge

Learning causal variables from raw data with partial expert knowledge and priced supervision.

See projects ↓

THEME 2

Causal discovery and time series under distribution shift

Recovering causal structure from time series and using it to predict reliably under shift.

See projects ↓

THEME 3

Reliable learning from satellite data

When predictions from satellite imagery and time series become trustworthy, and which models hold up.

See projects ↓

THEME 4

Benchmarks, challenges, and reproducibility

Re-implementing published methods under one protocol and running out-of-distribution challenges.

See projects ↓

THEME 1

Causal representation learning with partial knowledge

Experts rarely know the full causal structure of a system, but they usually know part of it. I build models that learn high-level causal variables from raw data, use that partial knowledge, and price the supervision they need before paying for it.

UNDER REVIEW

PCG-VAE: Learning Causal Representations under Partial Structural Knowledge

Emam Hossain, Md Osman Gani

Under review, CVPR 2027

Experts mark each causal link as known, forbidden, or unknown, and the model learns only the unknown ones. It recovers the hidden structure exactly in all 60 runs, compared with 3 of 20 for full discovery.

Paper coming soon
UNDER REVIEW

VLM-Gauge: Pricing Vision-Language Supervision for Causal Representation Learning

Emam Hossain, Md Osman Gani

Under review, ICLR 2027

Uses a vision-language model as the annotator and prices its labels before training: a label of quality J is worth about J² human labels. Labels on 17,000 images beat human labels on 4,000, and twelve attributes are supervised jointly.

Paper coming soon

THEME 2

Causal discovery and time series under distribution shift

Correlations learned in one setting often fail in another, while causal relationships should be more stable. I study how to recover causal structure from time series and use it to build predictors that stay reliable where they were not trained.

ICMLA 2025

Causal Time Series Modeling of Supraglacial Lake Evolution in Greenland under Distribution Shift

Emam Hossain, Muhammad Hasan Ferdous, Devon Dunmire, Aneesh Subramanian, Md Osman Gani

IEEE ICMLA 2025

Lag-aware causal graphs choose the predictors. Causal models beat correlation-based baselines in all six leave-one-basin-out tests, with accuracy gains of up to 12.59%.

KDD 2025

TimeGraph: Synthetic Benchmark Datasets for Robust Time-Series Causal Discovery

Muhammad Hasan Ferdous, Emam Hossain, Md Osman Gani

ACM SIGKDD 2025, Datasets and Benchmarks Track

Benchmarks with known causal graphs plus real-world trends, seasonality, missing data, and hidden confounders. Under nonlinear dynamics, standard methods often find none of the true links.

PerCom-W 2025

Correlation to Causation: A Causal Deep Learning Framework for Arctic Sea Ice Prediction

Emam Hossain, Muhammad Hasan Ferdous, Jianwu Wang, Aneesh Subramanian, Md Osman Gani

IEEE PerCom Workshops 2025; extended at the IJCAI AI4TS Workshop 2025

Granger causality and PCMCI+ pick the drivers of Arctic sea ice extent from 43 years of ocean and atmospheric data, and a GRU-LSTM model with the causal inputs predicts more accurately across lead times.

TMLR 2023

A Survey on Causal Discovery Methods for I.I.D. and Time Series Data

Uzma Hasan, Emam Hossain, Md Osman Gani

Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023 (Survey Certification)

Maps what each family of causal discovery methods assumes, so a practitioner can see which assumptions their data break.

THEME 3

Reliable learning from satellite data

Satellite imagery and time series of the Greenland Ice Sheet come with scarce labels, class imbalance, and conditions that change from year to year. I study when predictions become trustworthy and which modeling choices actually hold up.

PolDS 2026

Supraglacial Lake Fate Is Knowable Long Before the Season Ends

Emam Hossain, Md Osman Gani

ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Polar Data Science (PolDS) 2026

How early can we trust a prediction? Rapid lake drainage becomes predictable by 15 July, 92 days before a full-season model can be applied, and the ordering holds across learners and basins.

ICMLA 2026

Evaluating Zone-Guided Front Extraction for Glacier Calving-Front Delineation in SAR Imagery

Chhaya Kulkarni, Emam Hossain

IEEE ICMLA 2026

Tests whether zone labels can stand in for calving-front labels. Zone labels hold the boundary, but fronts from predicted zones stay weak, so zone scores should not replace front‑level evaluation.

IGARSS 2026

Why Convolution Still Matters: Evaluating Inductive Biases in Cryospheric Image Classification

Chhaya Kulkarni, Emam Hossain

IEEE IGARSS 2026

A controlled comparison of convolutional, attention-based, and hybrid models on Greenland Ice Sheet imagery. AlexNet gives the best accuracy and macro-F1: more complex models are not automatically more reliable.

EARTH SPACE SCI. 2025

Greenland Ice Sheet Wide Supraglacial Lake Evolution and Dynamics: Insights From the 2018 and 2019 Melt Seasons

Devon Dunmire, Aneesh Subramanian, Emam Hossain, Md Osman Gani, Alison Banwell, Hammad Younas, Brendan Myers

Earth and Space Science, 2025

Classifies every Greenland supraglacial lake in a low-melt and a high-melt season into four fates and releases the ice‑sheet‑wide dataset.

ICMLA 2024

Time Series Classification of Supraglacial Lakes Evolution over Greenland Ice Sheet

Emam Hossain, Md Osman Gani, Devon Dunmire, Aneesh Subramanian, Hammad Younas

IEEE ICMLA 2024

Models each lake’s satellite time series in a reconstructed phase space and reaches 89.70% accuracy when trained on a single representative sample per class.

THEME 4

Benchmarks, challenges, and reproducibility

Trustworthy AI needs evaluation that matches how models are used. I re-implement published methods under one protocol and help run community challenges that score models on data they have never seen.

IN PREPARATION

Evaluating a Benchmark Dataset for Supraglacial Lake Detection on the Greenland Ice Sheet

Bayu Adhi Tama, Michael MacFerrin, Josephine Namayanja, Sai Vikas Amaraneni, Emam Hossain, Maloy Kumar Devnath, Vandana Janeja, Aneesh Subramanian, Mohamed Mokbel

In preparation, Nature Scientific Data

Re-implements the five top-performing algorithms of the ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS Cup 2023 under consistent preprocessing and evaluation. I co-lead the reproducibility work and presented it in an invited flash talk at the FARR Workshop.

Paper coming soon
NSF HDR 2025–26

Predicting Coastal Flooding Events: Scientific Out-of-Distribution Challenge

iHARP sub-challenge, NSF HDR Machine Learning Challenge (Year 2)

Codabench, 2025–2026

As support team lead, I led the four-person team that implemented, ran, and evaluated the sub-challenge. It drew 2,709 submissions from 151 participants and scored every model on stations it never saw in training.

EARLIER WORK

Deep learning for forecasting (2019–2022)

Before my Ph.D. research, I worked on deep learning and expert systems for financial and environmental forecasting.

Papers by undergraduate students I advised are listed under Teaching & Mentoring.

Get in touch

I am always happy to talk about research, collaborations, and teaching.

Department of Information Systems, UMBC
Baltimore, Maryland